Historical, Epistemological and Educacional Paths to Think about Artscience

Authors

  • Letícia Jorge Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) / Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Científica e Tecnológica (PPGECT)
  • Luiz O. Q. Peduzzi Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) / Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Científica e Tecnológica (PPGECT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35819/tear.v11.n1.a5573

Abstract

Abstract: In the absence of studies that simultaneously integrate artistic and scientific knowledge, this work seeks to exemplify the transformations of scientific thinking by analyzing, in broader terms, some historical segments of physical science from artistic works. At first, epistemological discussions are carried out, between convergences and divergences of artscience, developed by physicists and philosophers of science Paul K. Feyerabend and Thomas S. Kuhn. Subsequently, educational debates on the theme are woven through aspects of the significant learning theory of Carl R. Rogers and the artistic expressiveness proposed by Natalie Rogers. In a third moment, artscience relationships are exemplified from historical episodes of physics together with some artistic forms. Finally, in the final discussions, the use of comic books (comics) is proposed as an art form capable of expressing the content (in an artistic and scientific way) and sharing it in and beyond the educational sphere.

Keywords: History of science and art’s aspects. Paul K. Feyerabend. Carl R. Rogers e Natalie Rogers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Historical, Epistemological and Educacional Paths to Think about Artscience. #Tear: Journal of Education, Science and Technology, Canoas, v. 11, n. 1, 2022. DOI: 10.35819/tear.v11.n1.a5573. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ifrs.edu.br/index.php/tear/article/view/5573. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2026.